The UN general assembly to raise
the issue of The Israeli racial wall to the International Court
of Justice
|
Sayyed
Fadlullah: the
Palestinians should establish a unified leadership that would outline
the political and security agenda of the Palestinians;a program in
which all parties play complementary and not conflicting roles
Asked
in his weekly seminar the following question : The Palestinian dialogue in Cairo ended without reaching
conclusive agreements, while the UN General Assembly decided to
submit the issue of the separating wall to the International Court
of Justice despite, the fact that the E.U backed down… How do
you read the general situation the Palestinians face at this
stage?
The Religious Authority
Sayyed Muhammad Hussein Fadlullah said:
I have always considered
that Palestine plays a pivotal role in the current and future
political changes in the region.
All what happens in the
region whether positive or negative is nourished by the
developments that take place in Palestine... Any positive
development in Palestine will have a positive impact on the Arabs
and Muslims especially in Iraq and the neighboring countries, and
any negative one will also have its negative effects on the
region. That is why the developments in Palestine and around it
are very critical, especially with the enemy getting ready for a
new stage of pressure and containment.
Meanwhile, we have
noticed of late that there are some international political
movements which apparently seek to condemn certain Israeli
aggressions but which actually strive to give the Israeli
occupation a realistic political legitimacy… The American
maneuvers and the European formal objections, which only seek to
score some points in the international competition of promoting
the interests of the various parties, enable Israel to expand and
strength its occupation.
Therefore, as we do not
understand why the states of the EU did not vote in the UN General
Assembly in favor of condemning the racist wall, we would like to
emphasize that the wall is a political issue and not a security
one. It is part of the Israeli stalling maneuvers that seek to
create new facts on the ground that cannot be removed.
What the EU, America and
the entire world should do is to remove the occupation, for all
the Palestinian leaders have announced many a time that they are
ready for peace, and that they will not fire one single shot if
the occupation withdraws…
We do not know what
prevents the Security Council and its effective members to take
the matter into their own hands… Moreover, why do they insist
even in the Road Map on the Palestinian security obligations and
not that of the Israelis who kill Palestinian children for example
on a daily basis.
We hope that the EU
stances will be different from that of America, which provides
absolute support even for the Israeli atrocities. In this respect,
we have noticed that the EU is aware that Sharon’s Israel is
building a separating and permanent border and not solving a
security problem. This wall will undermine the Palestinian state
even before it exists. As for the American plan to support this
state, it is but a part of the show the Americans are staging to
reelect Bush… Thus, we believe that the credibility of the EU is
at stake, for without coming up with a working mechanism for a
solution in Palestine, nothing will stop Sharon from pursuing his
plans.
We feel that the
Palestinians should be aware of what is going on around them in
this critical stage, which is characterized by keeping their cause
dependent on the American elections and international relations,
as well as being a prisoner of stalling.
We also feel that the
Palestinians should continue their dialogue, but not based on
adapting to the international and regional changes. They should
seek to find the means to strengthen their internal front to face
the coming stages, which could be more dangerous than the current
one. This could be done by establishing a unified Palestinian
leadership that would outline the political and security agenda of
the Palestinians; a program which envisages for all parties to
play complementary and not conflicting roles... Any development in
the region and in the world should be utilized in what serves the
Palestinian cause and not the opposite... especially that the
world is aware of the magnitude of the Israeli crises.
If this happens America
will not be able to pressurize the world as a whole, for there is
no place in the third millennium for any occupation.
|