Noticing
that the Israeli threats to Iran aim at creating a Muslim siege to the
Intifada…
Fadlullah
emphasizes that the Aggression against Iran will spread the war in a
way unimagined by Israel.
Asked
in his weekly seminar about the Israeli threats against Iran, Sayyed
Fadlullah answered:
We should not look at the new Israeli
and American threats to Iran in a way that separates them from the
recent successive developments and the American attempt to subdue the
states that still oppose the American policies. The current American
Administration believes that it now has a window of opportunity to
exert pressure on these states and make them conform with the American
strategy in the region, especially with respect tothe consequences of
the war in Afghanistan that made it feel that it could now impose its
own conditions, by threatening to start the second phase of the
so-called war on terrorism.
Thus the new American report about
the states that support the so-called terrorism is but a new chapter
in these threats, that are supposed to draw red lines to Iran in
particular, so that it will end its support to the liberation
movements especially the Intifada and the Palestinian people. It is an
effort that aims to facilitate its besiege since it managed to build
Arab political fences around it and is now looking for a Muslim one
that would contribute in suffocating or paralyzing it.
The
coordination between Israel and America in the political and
informational campaign is comprehensive, and full. Moreover, they are
trying to prevent Iran from possessing any military strength it might
need to defend itself, and provide more confidence to continue its
support to the Resistance in Lebanon and the Intifada in Palestine.
And this in turn will hinder the execution of the American plan that
aims at preparing the region for a new phase of surrender, having
thought that it holds the keys of the region in the aftermath of the
war in Afghanistan.
The Israeli
threats against Iran are not new. They prove that while Israel is
afraid of the intentions of the Islamic Republic that is still
committed to the principles of the late Imam Khumeini regarding the
rights and the cause of the Palestinian people, it is also preparing
for a political and informational atmosphere that prevents Iran from
developing its military and technological ability, to remain just
another ordinary state of the Third World that is totally preoccupied
with its internal problems.
But the
Zionist enemy whose political and security worries and even obsessions
might drive it to seriously consider the option of striking Iran, or
induce the Americans to carry out such a strike, Knows that Iran can
retaliate and in different fronts. It also knows that any such
aggressive step will create a state of general chaos that could exceed
the boundaries of the region. It is no picnic to strike Iran, for it
will spread the war in a way unimagined by Israel and create a new
wave of strategic and security worries that will haunt the Israelis.
|